The morning
after watching the (not so) ably hosted “Cocaine Capital of the World” about
the booming drugs trade in Peru, many of us woke to the news of two British
teenagers having been arrested at Lima airport for attempting to smuggle drugs
back to Europe.
It is
hardly surprising this caused a lot of commotion in some areas with people
calling for the UK government to help them avoid a lengthy stay without trial
in what are regarded as some of the worst and most violent prisons in the
world.
Sadly this
is not an isolated case. Recently Lindsey Sandiford, a British grandmother, was
sentenced to death in Indonesia for smuggling an alleged £1.6million of cocaine
into the country.
Sandiford’s
case, if anything, caused more of a stir and led to various groups being formed
to take donations to fund her legal defence.
Nobody
would wish the conditions these women, and the hundreds of other UK citizens
held across the world on similar charges, find themselves in on their worst
enemy.
Peruvian
and Indonesian jails are notorious for violence and bad treatment, Sandiford is
likely to spend years, if not decades on death row, and Melissa Reid and
Michaella McCollum will be forced to wait around three-years before they appear
in front of a judge.
This
undeniably bad treatment leads to many public and political campaigns to free
these people and repatriate them back home, however, this view is bizarrely
hypocritical.
For a long
time now all western governments have actively encouraged countries like
Columbia, Mexico and more recently Peru to act against the drug cartels
operating in their countries and crackdown on smuggling.
This is the
way things should be done. Tightening border checks in the UK to stop drugs
getting into the country is certainly important, but inconsequential if the
supply of drugs is increasing.
Hisotry
shows the trade is so lucrative the smugglers simply find more and more
ingenious ways of shipping their product, for example the submarines which have
been found in recent years.
Naturally
these countries, who cannot afford high-tech air and shipping port controls,
sniffer dogs, specialised police or undercover intelligence, react to this by
increasing the checks they carry out and imposing very tough sentences on those
caught.
Of cause
there are flaws in this plan. Without an efficient and incorruptible legal
system you end up with situations where people spend years waiting for a trial,
but then again they were caught smuggling drugs.
If
Sandiford, Reid or McCollum was caught dealing drugs in this country nobody
would have any sympathy for them.
All three
of the women mentioned and no doubt many, if not all, of the people languishing
in foreign prisons claim to have been physically forced or coerced into doing something
they did not want to do.
This may be
true in some cases, although it would be rather naive to think it was as common
as claimed.
However,
claiming ignorance or coercion has never been an effective legal defence.
In an
admittedly bad comparison, war criminals often claim innocence because they
were just following orders and there are numerous examples of wives and girlfriends
who covered up for their partners illegal behaviour.
The reason
for these being such ineffective pleas is because the law is an absolute state.
If you were aware you were committing a crime you are guilty, regardless of the
motive.
The problem
when people react like this is it appears to make a distinction between foreign
drug traffickers and British drug traffickers. As if by somehow holding a UK
passport is a get out of jail free card for when things go wrong.
Essentially
what has happened is the UK has asked for something and then people are
criticising the result.
Everyone
agrees more needs to be done to stop cocaine smuggling out of South America, but
then are outraged when its UK citizens get arrested.
We cannot
have both in this situation. Either the South American governments crackdown on
trafficking and we accept some Brits will spend time in unpleasant prisons, or you
have to live with ever increasing quantities of drugs ending up on the streets.
As
residents of a developed nation it is right our government affords us help when
we are wrongfully persecuted overseas, but this privilege should not be extended
to those who have genuinely committed crimes.
No comments:
Post a Comment